On Wed, Jan 22, 2014, at 07:01 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 20 January 2014 14:39, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 Jan 2014 08:06, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it enough to know the python process and how to write good patches? I don't see why Yury would become but not Vajrasky Kok.
In this case, it's Yury's specific contributions to an orphan module and being a co-author of an accepted PEP related to that module that motivate my suggestion, rather than general bug fixing (which I agree would typically involve a wider range of contributions).
I see it as similar to the way we grant commit access to authors of "add a module to the standard library" PEPs as a matter of course so they can continue maintaining it.
Ping?
Yury's someone I run *my* inspect module changes by, so it would definitely make my life easier if I could +1 his patches and he could take care of committing and pushing them himself.
I don't see anyone complaining too loudly, so have him send his key to hgaccounts@python.org.