And this email was written when heading out the door, so sorry if came off as me being short.
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017, 14:32 Brett Cannon, email@example.com wrote:
This off-topic for this thread. If you want to discuss adding support for another trigger phrase you can bring it up on core-workflow.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017, 14:36 Alex Gaynor, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Can we please use a phrase for re-triggering a review that makes more sense like "I've updated the patch, please re-review", rather than magic inside baseball language?
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Brett Cannon email@example.com wrote:
I noticed today that out of about 19 pages of issues, only the first 5 have "awaiting" labels. Would people object if I back-filled those open issues lacking an "awaiting" label? For those that have a "changes requested" review a comment that said roughly "we noticed there's a review asking for changes; if you already did that then let us know by saying 'I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition' and we will update this pull request accordingly" (the other stages don't have potential false-positives).
The reason I'm asking before coding this up and running it is there will be some churn in notifications for those issues that get a comment about "awaiting changes".
python-committers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: D1B3 ADC0 E023 8CA6