March 30, 2013
5:13 p.m.
In article <20130330141534.44893250BDD@webabinitio.net>, "R. David Murray" <rdmurray@bitdance.com> wrote:
This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head).
3.1?
-- Ned Deily, nad@acm.org