On 8/2/2018 8:01 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:43 PM Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 17:58 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wijaya@gmail.com> wrote: [..]
I'm open to extend the dates, and even wait another year if we need to. Or do folks want to come up with a completely different process than what I've proposed?
In the end, I just want to know whether we will come to decision before 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, .. ?
IMHO we should tweak the proposal to include just *one date for now*: we want everybody interested to post their proposals by October 1st (we can shift it + 2 weeks if people are on vacations right now).
I was actually going to email suggesting this but Mariatta beat me to the subject. :)
I think you've confused Mariatta with me here :)
For me, I think aiming for October 1st to get the initial proposals in is a good goal.
Yeah it looks like people don't oppose having October 1st as our first *soft* sync point as long as we don't set any other deadlines right now.
To sum up:
We want everybody who has ideas about future Python governance model to submit their initial proposals by that date.
The discussion will start around October 1st and we'll figure out what we do next (and when) based on its outcome.
I think this plan is reasonably relaxed, but at the same time will gently motivate us to move forward.
I agree.