The survey isn't biased. You have a value "the same /worse than the status quo" - wherein the status quo is subversion. If you hate DVCes, you mark it as "same/worse than the status quo" and we move on.
No one is suggesting we accept *less* functionality than subversion: in fact we're looking at these for *more* functionality.
On Feb 27, 2009 7:04pm, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@pythonware.com> wrote:
>
> No need for a long answer - just explain what the purpose of the survey is, and why it isn't as biasad as it appears to be. A process where you're actively discouraging people with a certain opinion from getting involved isn't much of a process.
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2009 9:24 PM, "Brett Cannon" brett@python.org> wrote:
>
> I had a long reply all written out, but instead I decided to discard it so as to not continue to drag this discussion out. Why? The DVCS PEP is not even finished yet!
>
>
> Can you guys please let me finish the PEP before you start worrying about whether we are going to switch? At least give me the chance to make a decision on whether I think it is reasonable to switch and what to switch to. And then we can have a reasonable conversation where I update the PEP to address any questions that come up.
>
>
>
> -Brett
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:59, Fredrik Lundh fredrik@pythonware.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 27, ...