10 Jul
2009
10 Jul
'09
9:29 p.m.
Jesus Cea wrote:
Georg Brandl wrote:
I think this should be reverted -- the support code is not for the bsddb module, but for building the dbm module with bsddb.
I pretend to ask for re-inclusion of BerkeleyDB in Python 3.x branch in the future (maybe around christmas), now that it is under control, very solid, and a needed storage option in the standard lib.
It seems to me (though I admit I haven't been watching closely recently) that the buildbots still report bsddb errors on trunk on a fairly regular basis. If I'm not imagining things is there any chance you could take a look at that?
--David