You still haven't explained why e.g. Zulip
I think that Zulip is a good service and AFAIK Zulip is the OSS project based on Python. But I think that such communication tools should be evaluated not only technology side but also on how people feel familiar with UI/UX. I don't want to evaluate the UI/UX accessibility of Zulip is good or bad but it's the issue of how people feel familiar. This phenomenon also occurs in other common (non-business) messengers. (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, etc..) You can observe that there is no single monopoly messenger which concurs worldwide.
The list of tools that I suggested is based on my personal observation which is normally used in tech companies. If people feel familiar and such things can address people's productivity I think that that's a good reason to choose.
2021년 5월 15일 (토) 오후 11:16, Antoine Pitrou firstname.lastname@example.org님이 작성:
Le 15/05/2021 à 13:23, Senthil Kumaran a écrit :
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 11:13:48AM +0900, Dong-hee Na wrote:
So I'm also a supporter of new communication tools.
I agree with everything you've mentioned, Dong-hee. Need for good tool/system that addressed our evolving needs was one of the driver of this conversation.
You still haven't explained why e.g. Zulip (which has a modern Web UI, a very well-thought threading mechanism, several clients, many integrations, is widely used, and is open source), doesn't « address our evolving needs ». In other words, I see lots of vague complaining and no concrete argument.
Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-committers.python.org/ Message archived at https://email@example.com/message/G... Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/