When in doubt, such discussions should be escalated to python-dev. I don't know if this one was, though I vaguely recall seeing it discussed somewhere. Anyway, since it's been released, it should stay in.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 05:20, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2015 11:08 AM, "Robert Collins" <robertc@robertcollins.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
>> > The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
>> > specific exemptions from the backwards compatibility requirements for
>> > security fixes -- because their lifespan will still be many years (EOL
>> > of
>> > 2.7 is summer 2020).
>> [snip]
>> https://docs.python.org/devguide/devcycle.html#security-branches
>> "...The only changes made to a security branch are those fixing issues
>> exploitable by attackers such as crashes, privilege escalation and,
>> optionally, other issues such as denial of service attacks. Any other
>> changes are not considered a security risk and thus not backported to
>> a security branch."
>>
>> This page doesn't specify the exception for 2.7, and by my poor
>> reading of it the http issue wouldn't pass muster - but I think it was
>> appropriate to apply. So I'm confused. Help :).
>
> See PEP 466.
>
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0466/

Thanks - but that doesn't cover the 22928 fix as far as I can tell. It
explicitly says in fact that its not carte blanch, and that things
still need to be discussed....

and I'm still not clear where we should discuss them :)

-Rob

--
Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)