-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:10 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2009-02-26 15:50, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hi,
I'm no trying to advocate switching to a DVCS, but really:
I think that's a much better approach and one that reduces the load on the python.org repo sys-admins.
How does having 4 more-or-less supported VCSes, rather than 1,
lighten the load on the sysadmins? Even though the DVCSes are theoretically handled by separate people, they have needs which must be fulfilled
by the sysadmins (e.g. for Mercurial, mod_wsgi had to be installed for
the Web front-end; and we see how much cooperation Bazaar support seems
to require from the sysadmins).I didn't know that and was under the impression that those other systems simply hook up to the svn repo via the standard Subversion interfaces.
Well, for Bazaar, there's a plugin that speaks svn. I really don't
think there's much ongoing maintenance other than setting up a cronjob
to sync the mirror to the svn master every minute or so. From then
on, it should just work. Most of the churn in the bzr branches hosted
on code.python.org is because it was an experiment we hacked together
at Pycon, so I'm mostly trying to consolidate, update and bring parts
of that in house.
I don't understand that comment. Of course, you can commit whatever changes you make to the branch. It's not done locally and then
forwarded, but that's not really a technical disadvantage, it's merely a
different way to work.
It is when you're on an 18 hour train ride and not on the net.
Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSabJZnEjvBPtnXfVAQKj5gP7BOThbs2CD4F7h+ERpRHPRR/rNww12l/a sJON8U9N9YVTs7Yfzy267Zg204Dm8lE/lxVtu6Ial9RdqGC8rMjD3sDHNuBkFKyD PvtQbDohudzytGs2GW2as1FcqpQIBPfhXoPwzQxvjfoVegutRfmdieMh/4WZjRaG B23O9Wcicgw= =bJro -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----