28 Feb
2013
28 Feb
'13
1:36 p.m.
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller <jnoller@gmail.com> wrote:
Precisely. None of us are lawyers; the CLA was made by lawyers to be compatible with the Python license "stack" which has its own set of issues.
That all said; again, the likelihood of short term alteration of the CLA is a non starter, so he can feel free to take his time to understand why we require contributions to be licensed to the PSF under the listed licenses.
However; I've sent this to a real lawyer for his opinion.
Since this came up again on python-dev, did you ever receive any reply from the real lawyer?
Best Regards, Ezio Melotti