
May 18, 2017
3:59 a.m.
On Wed, 17 May 2017 11:35:29 -0700, Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wijaya@gmail.com> wrote:
It's possible, but remember not all PRs have bpo-issue, eg those with trivial label. In that case, what should the backport branch be? So we might end up with two backport branch name patterns, eg
backport-bpo-NNNN-
andbackport-sha1
for the trivial PRs ?
I don't think it is a problem for the bpo issue number to be missing if there isn't one. (I presume you meant 'backport-bpo-NNNN-sha1` for the BPO alternative.) But how abut using the github PR number in that case?
--David