On Jan 29, 2011, at 12:04 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
If the module weren't already broken for most real-world purposes I'd no question want to wait. As it is I'm on the fence.
Me too, but I did want to acknowledge the correctness of Antoine's argument. Yes, I reminded people (using multiprocessing as an example, which I agree was probably not a fair parallel) that ignoring process can have negative consequences, but I do agree with you about the desirability of not having to wait for 3.3.
Who'd be a release manager?