New mailing list for workflow/workflow infrastructure discussion/tasks
Apologies for the cross post, but I want to make sure committers who aren't reading python-dev for one reason or another see this:
Based on a number of conversations at PyCon, we've created a new mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
The purpose of this list is to facilitate the conversations and coordinate the work that needs to happen to improve our development workflow. Nick's PEP is one piece of this conversation, but there are many other aspects to it as well.
Here is the list description:
This is a place to discuss and work on improvements to the CPython core
development workflow and the infrastructure that supports that workflow.
This includes changes to the roundup interface and functionality, rietveld,
mercurial, buildbots, and any other infrastructure we may add. It also
includes discussing how we use these tools, and most importantly how we use
these tools to integrate the community beyond the core developers into the
workflow that gets patches committed to the python repository. This means
that it also includes discussions of the process of bringing in new
contributors, including how we use the core-mentorship list, as well as how
we organize ticket triage, and how we make use of external resources such
as openhatch. Discussions of documentation and how we organize and
maintain the documentation are also appropriate.Anyone who is interested helping with this, or who wants to keep up with the evolution of our thoughts on these topics, are invited to sign up to the mailing list.
We will of course check in with python-dev and/or python-committers as appropriate.
--David
On 4/16/2014 4:49 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
Apologies for the cross post, but I want to make sure committers who aren't reading python-dev for one reason or another see this:
Based on a number of conversations at PyCon, we've created a new mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
Will it be a public list, accessible via gmane, or subcription-only?
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:02:31 -0400, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 4/16/2014 4:49 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
Apologies for the cross post, but I want to make sure committers who aren't reading python-dev for one reason or another see this:
Based on a number of conversations at PyCon, we've created a new mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflowWill it be a public list, accessible via gmane, or subcription-only?
Public. Ned has already submitted a request to get it added to gmane.
--David
On 16 Apr 2014 21:07, "R. David Murray" <rdmurray@bitdance.com> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:02:31 -0400, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 4/16/2014 4:49 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
Apologies for the cross post, but I want to make sure committers who aren't reading python-dev for one reason or another see this:
Based on a number of conversations at PyCon, we've created a new
mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflowWill it be a public list, accessible via gmane, or subcription-only?
Public. Ned has already submitted a request to get it added to gmane.
Note that the reason for the new list is that we expect it to be a home for lots of nitty gritty details related to getting the various tools to play nicely together, and expect most folks will find that uninteresting. With a new list, python-dev and python-committers threads can focus on planned large scale user experience changes, leaving minor tweaks and mechanics for the new list. Similarly, the existing infrastructure list can focus more on general hosting and sustainability issues, rather than the specifics of the workflow tools.
The other advantage is that at least one of the Mercurial devs is planning to join the new list to help us work out improved Mercurial usage guidelines for both external contributors and core developers. Our current recommendations are still largely based on Mercurial as it existed at the time of the transition from svn, and things have moved on significantly since then.
The final thing the new list will hopefully provide is a better way for folks to contribute when they would like to help with core development, but find software lifecycles measured in years and decades unbearably slow, and aren't particularly excited by the idea of working on the documentation.
Cheers, Nick.
--David
python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
participants (3)
-
Nick Coghlan -
R. David Murray -
Terry Reedy