The bias is that the framing of the survey doesn't distinguish between "better in absolute terms" and "better given that we already have a working system and that there's a cost for *lots* of people if we switch". I'm surprised that you can claim that everything's ok even though several people that appear to be concerned about the latter has stated that they won't participate in the survey.
On Feb 28, 2009 1:11 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
The survey isn't biased. You have a value "the same /worse than the status quo" - wherein the status quo is subversion. If you hate DVCes, you mark it as "same/worse than the status quo" and we move on.
No one is suggesting we accept *less* functionality than subversion: in fact we're looking at these for *more* functionality.
On Feb 27, 2009 7:04pm, Fredrik Lundh email@example.com wrote: > > No need for a long answe...
On Feb 27, 2009 9:24 PM, "Brett Cannon" firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > I had
a long reply all writt...