-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Am 30.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Nick Coghlan:

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Georg Brandl georg@python.org wrote:

...

...

And why it does test with and without "module".

Because it always did (there's a thing called backwards compatibility.)

This is of course probably the obvious one to start a deprecation process.

But why do we check the long suffix for the *new* extension module naming variants from PEP 3149 and PEP 384? Those are completely new, so there's no backwards compatibility argument there.

It's for easy transition I guess -- you take the same module name and just tack on .abi3.so instead of .so.

Georg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1FbB8ACgkQN9GcIYhpnLC6qwCghvhPM1bMaNgmB8SUEoe73vzV DP0AnjKDxrR6Y59uFtSRzmWA+qtvBViA =8H8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----