I also have various old repositories. Could you please remove the 2 following repositories?

features/faster-format: work merged into cpython, issues #14716 and #14744 sandbox/split-unicodeobject.c: idea rejected after two discussions on python-dev mailing list

--

sandbox/registervm must not be deleted: I'm still working on it. FYI I will present my work at FOSDEM in one month: http://python-fosdem.org/talk/10-two-projects-to-optimize-python

Victor

Am 09.01.2013 10:30, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:

Hi,

...

I was testing whether Rietveld could be used to review a devguide patch, and I accidentally created this server-side clone:

http://hg.python.org/cjerdonek/sandbox-devguide/

Is there a way for me to remove it, or does someone else need to do it? In addition, if "Remote hg repo" URLs on the issue tracker don't need to be on hg.python.org, the following one can also be deleted (I was confusing this with the restriction for custom builders):

http://hg.python.org/sandbox/cjerdonek-devguide/

I (or Georg :-))'ll take a look. We actually have a script which deletes unused clones, but I've been wary of putting it in a cron job, for fear that it might cause unwanted deletions.

I've now also removed the following repos, which were "stale" by our definition (no changes made since their clone for several months):

• alphavirgo/cpython/
• features/bithinpy/
• default/repo/
• features/pep-380/
• sandbox/tkdocs/
• sandbox/distutils2/

I've kept three sandbox/ repositories that are stale, but have known core-dev owners