Mailman 3 February 2010 - Python-Dev

Re: [Python-Dev] Proposal for virtualenv functionality in Python
by P.J. Eby Feb. 21, 2010

Feb. 21, 2010

At 01:49 PM 2/19/2010 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: >I'm not sure how this should best work on Windows (without symlinks, >and where things generally work differently), but I would hope if >this idea is more visible that someone more opinionated than I would >propose the appropriate analog on Windows. You'd probably have to just copy pythonv.exe to an appropriate directory, and have it use the configuration file to find the "real" prefix. At least, that'd be a relatively obvious way to do it, and it would have the advantage of being symmetrical across platforms: just copy or symlink pythonv, and make sure the real prefix is in your config file. (Windows does have "shortcuts" but I don't think that there's any way for a linked program to know *which* shortcut it was launched from.)

14 20

Proposal for virtualenv functionality in Python
by Ian Bicking Feb. 21, 2010

Feb. 21, 2010

This is a proto-proposal for including some functionality from virtualenv in Python itself. I'm not entirely confident about what I'm proposing, so it's not really PEP-ready, but I wanted to get feedback... First, a bit about how virtualenv works (this will use Linux conventions; Windows and some Mac installations are slightly different): * Let's say you are creating an environment in ~/env/ * /usr/bin/python is *copied* to ~/env/bin/python * This alone sets sys.prefix to ~/env/ (via existing code in Python) * At this point things are broken because the standard library is not available * virtualenv creates ~/env/lib/pythonX.Y/site.py, which adds the system standard library location (/usr/lib/pythonX.Y) to sys.path * site.py itself requires several modules to work, and each of these modules (from a pre-determined list of modules) is symlinked over from the standard library into ~/env/lib/pythonX.Y/ * site.py may or may not add /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages to sys.path * *Any* time you use ~/env/bin/python you'll get sys.prefix of ~/env/, and the appropriate path. No environmental variable is required. * No compiler is used; this is a fairly light tool There are some tweaks to this that could be made, but I believe virtualenv basically does things The Right Way. By setting sys.prefix All Tools Work (there are some virtualenv alternatives that do isolation without setting sys.prefix, but they typically break more often than virtualenv, or only support a limited number of workflows). Also by using a distinct interpreter (~/env/bin/python) it works fairly consistently and reliably compared to techniques like an environmental variable. The one serious alternative is what buildout (and virtualenv --relocatable) does, which is to use the system Python and change the path at the beginning of all scripts (it requires its own installer to accomplish this consistently). But virtualenv is kind of a hack, and I believe with a little support from Python this could be avoided. virtualenv can continue to exist to support the equivalent workflows on earlier versions of Python, but it would not exist (or would become much much simpler) on further Python versions. The specific parts of virtualenv that are a hack that I would like to replace with built-in functionality: * I'd rather ~/env/bin/python be a symlink instead of copying it. * I'd rather not copy (or symlink) *any* of the standard library. * I'd rather site.py support this functionality natively (and in turn that OS packagers support this when they make other modifications) * Compiling extensions can be tricky because code may not find headers (because they are installed in /usr, not ~/env/). I think this can be handled better if virtualenv is slightly less intrusive, or distutils is patched, or generally tools are more aware of this layout. * This gets more complicated with a Mac framework build of Python, and hopefully those hacks could go away too. I am not sure what the best way to do this is, but I will offer at least one suggestion (other suggestions welcome): In my (proto-)proposal, a new binary pythonv is created. This is slightly like pythonw.exe, which provides a Python interpreter on Windows which doesn't open a new window. This binary is primarily for creating new environments. It doesn't even need to be on $PATH, so it would be largely invisible to people unless they use it. If you symlink pythonv to a new location, it will effect sys.prefix (currently sys.prefix is calculated after dereferencing the symlink). Additionally, the binary will look for a configuration file. I'm not sure where this file should go; perhaps directly alongside the binary, or in some location based on sys.prefix. The configuration file would be a simple set of assignments; some I might imagine: * Maybe override sys.prefix * Control if the global site-packages is placed on sys.path * On some operating systems there are other locations for packages installed with the system packager; probably these should be possible to enable or disable * Maybe control installations or point to a file like distutils.cfg I got some feedback from the Debian/Ubuntu maintainer that he would like functionality that might be like this; for instance, if you have /usr/bin/python2.6 and /usr/bin/python2.6-dbg, he'd like them to work slightly different (e.g., /usr/bin/python2.6-dbg would look in a different place for libraries). So the configuration file location should be based on sys.prefix *and* the name of the binary itself (e.g., /usr/lib/python2.6/python-config-dbg.conf). I have no strong opinion on the location of the file itself, only that it can be specific to the directory and name of the interpreter. In addition to all this, I think sys would grow another prefixy value, e.g., sys.build_prefix, that points to the place where Python was actually built (virtualenv calls this sys.real_prefix, but that's not a very good name). Some code, especially in distutils, might need to be aware of this to compile extensions properly (we can be somewhat aware of these cases by looking at places where virtualenv already has problems compiling extensions). Some people have argued for something like sys.prefixes, a list of locations you might look at, which would allow a kind of nesting of these environments (where sys.prefixes[-1] == sys.prefix; or maybe reversed). Personally this seems like it would be hard to keep mental track of this, but I can understand the purpose -- you could for instance create a kind of template prefix that has *most* of what you want installed in it, then create sub-environments that contain for instance an actual application, or a checkout (to test just one new piece of code). I'm not sure how this should best work on Windows (without symlinks, and where things generally work differently), but I would hope if this idea is more visible that someone more opinionated than I would propose the appropriate analog on Windows. -- Ian Bicking | http://blog.ianbicking.org | http://twitter.com/ianbicking

6 7

lib3to2 in the 3.2 standard library?
by Joe Amenta Feb. 21, 2010

Feb. 21, 2010

Hey folks, I'm going to write a PEP for inclusion of lib3to2 in the standard library for 3.2 and above. Before do, though, do people have any quick thoughts about it? My inclination is to get it stabilized beforehand (perhaps during another GSoC) by fleshing out the fixer that warns about backwards-incompatible features in Python 3 and by finishing up the fix_imports2 fixer, probably involving a rewrite. http://bitbucket.org/amentajo/lib3to2 is where the source is hosted (there's a separate branch for 3.1) http://www.startcodon.com/wordpress/?cat=8 is where I blog about it. http://pypi.python.org/pypi/3to2 is the PyPI page that has both of those links. --Joe Amenta

3 2

Ctrl-C handling in pdb
by Ilya Sandler Feb. 21, 2010

Feb. 21, 2010

I have used pdb for several years and have always wanted a gdb-like Ctrl-C handling: in gdb pressing Ctrl-C interrupts the program but the execution can be resumed later by the user (while pdb will terminate the program and throw you into postmortem debugging with no ability to resume the execution). So I implemented this functionality as http://bugs.python.org/issue7245. The patch is very simple: install a SIGINT handler and when SIGINT arrives, set the tracing. The signal handler is only activated when pdb is run as a script. I cann't think of any disadvantages. If this functionality is indeed useful and I am not missing some serious side effects, would it be possible to review the patch? Thanks, Ilya Sandler

1 0

Re: [Python-Dev] Proposal for virtualenv functionality in Python
by P.J. Eby Feb. 20, 2010

Feb. 20, 2010

At 02:41 PM 2/20/2010 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: >Virtualenv uses copies when it can't use symlinks. Â A copy (or hard >link) seems appropriate on systems that do not have symlinks. Â It >would seem reasonable that on Windows it might look in the registry >to find the actual location where Python was installed. Â Or... >whatever technique Windows people think is best; it's simply >necessary that the interpreter know its location (the isolated >environment) and also know where Python is installed. Â All this >needs to be calculated in C, as the standard library needs to be on >the path very early (so os.symlink wouldn't help, but any C-level >function to determine this would be helpful). The ways pretty much boil down to: 1. Explicit per-instance configuration (either appended to the .exe or in a file adjacent to it), 2. An implicit global search/lookup (PATH, registry, etc.) 3. A combination of the two, checking explicit configuration before implicit. Since the virtualenv itself may need some kind of nearby configuration anyway, putting it in that file seems to me like the One Obvious Way To Do It. Windows does have C-level APIs for reading and writing .ini files, from the good old days before the registry existed. And the C-level code might only need to read one entry prior to booting Python anyway - a single call to the GetPrivateProfileString function, once you've determined the name of the file to be read from.

1 0

Buffered streams design + raw io gotchas
by Pascal Chambon Feb. 20, 2010

Feb. 20, 2010

Hello, As I continue experimenting with advanced streams, I'm currently beginning an important modification of io's Buffered and Text streams (removal of locks, adding of methods...), to fit the optimization process of the whole library. However, I'm now wondering what the idea is behind the 3 main buffer classes : Bufferedwriter, Bufferedreader and Bufferedrandom. The i/o PEP claimed that the two first ones were for sequential streams only, and the latter for all kinds of seekable streams; but as it is implemented, actually the 3 classes can be returned by open() for seekable files. Am I missing some use case in which this distinction would be useful (for optimizations ?) ? Else, I guess I should just create a RSBufferedStream class which handles all kinds of situations, raising InsupportedOperation exceptions whenever needed.... after all, text streams act that way (there is no TextWriter or TextReader stream), and they seem fine. Also, io.open() might return a raw file stream when we set buffering=0. The problem is that raw file streams are NOT like buffered streams with a buffer limit of zero : raw streams might fail writing/reading all the data asked, without raising errors. I agree this case should be rare, but it might be a gotcha for people wanting direct control of the stream (eg. for locking purpose), but no silently incomplete read/write operation. Shouldn't we rather return a "write through" buffered stream in this case "buffering=0", to cleanly handle partial read/write ops ? regards, Pascal PS : if you have 3 minutes, I'd be very interested by your opinion on the "advanced modes" draft below. Does it seem intuitive to you ? In particular, shouldn't the "+" and "-" flags have the opposite meaning ? http://bytebucket.org/pchambon/python-rock-solid-tools/wiki/rsopen.html

2 3

deprecated stuff in standard library
by Sjoerd Mullender Feb. 20, 2010

Feb. 20, 2010

I have noticed that deprecated stuff is still being used in the standard Python library. When using modules that contain deprecated stuff you get a warning, and as a mere user there isn't much you can do about that. As a general rule, the Python standard library should not use deprecated constructs in non-deprecated (or otherwise deprecated) modules. The case I am running into is that mhlib uses multifile (in 2.6). -- Sjoerd Mullender

8 11

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3146: Merge Unladen Swallow into CPython
by Maciej Fijalkowski Feb. 18, 2010

Feb. 18, 2010

Snippet from: http://codereview.appspot.com/186247/diff2/5014:8003/7002 *PyPy*: PyPy [#pypy]_ has good performance on numerical code, but is slower than Unladen Swallow on non-numerical workloads. PyPy only supports 32-bit x86 code generation. It has poor support for CPython extension modules, making migration for large applications prohibitively expensive. That part at the very least has some sort of personal opinion "prohibitively", while the other part is not completely true "slower than US on non-numerical workloads". Fancy providing a proof for that? I'm well aware that there are benchmarks on which PyPy is slower than CPython or US, however, I would like a bit more weighted opinion in the PEP. Cheers, fijal

3 4

Re: [Python-Dev] [issue2636] Regexp 2.7 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)
by MRAB Feb. 18, 2010

Feb. 18, 2010

Vlastimil Brom wrote: > Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom(a)gmail.com> added the comment: > > I just tested the fix for unicode tracebacks and found some possibly weird results (not sure how/whether it should be fixed, as these inputs are indeed rather artificial...). > (win XPp SP3 Czech, Python 2.6.4) > > Using the cmd console, the output is fine (for the characters it can accept and display) > >>>> regex.findall(ur"\p{InBasicLatinĚ}", u"aé") > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 1244, in _parse_property > raise error("undefined property name '%s'" % name) > regex.error: undefined property name 'InBasicLatinĚ' > > (same result for other distorted "proprety names" containing e.g. ěščřžýáíéúůßäëiöüîô ... > > However, in Idle the output differs depending on the characters present > >>>> regex.findall(ur"\p{InBasicLatinÉ}", u"ab c") > yields the expected > ... > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 1244, in _parse_property > raise error("undefined property name '%s'" % name) > error: undefined property name 'InBasicLatinÉ' > > but > >>>> regex.findall(ur"\p{InBasicLatinĚ}", u"ab c") > > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 1244, in _parse_property > raise error("undefined property name '%s'" % name) > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 167, in __init__ > message = message.encode(sys.stdout.encoding) > File "C:\Python26\lib\encodings\cp1250.py", line 12, in encode > return codecs.charmap_encode(input,errors,encoding_table) > UnicodeEncodeError: 'charmap' codec can't encode character u'\xcc' in position 37: character maps to <undefined> > > which might be surprising, as cp1250 should be able to encode "Ě", maybe there is some intermediate ascii step? > > using the wxpython pyShell I get its specific encoding error: > > regex.findall(ur"\p{InBasicLatinÉ}", u"ab c") > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 1102, in _parse_escape > return _parse_property(source, info, in_set, ch) > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 1244, in _parse_property > raise error("undefined property name '%s'" % name) > File "C:\Python26\lib\regex.py", line 167, in __init__ > message = message.encode(sys.stdout.encoding) > AttributeError: PseudoFileOut instance has no attribute 'encoding' > > (the same for \p{InBasicLatinĚ} etc.) > Maybe it shouldn't show the property name at all. That would avoid the problem. > > In python 3.1 in Idle, all of these exceptions are displayed correctly, also in other scripts or with special characters. > > Maybe in python 2.x e.g. repr(...) of the unicode error messages could be used in order to avoid these problems, but I don't know, what the conventions are in these cases. > > > Another issue I found here (unrelated to tracebacks) are backslashes or punctuation (except the handled -_) in the property names, which just lead to failed mathces and no exceptions about unknown property names > > regex.findall(u"\p{InBasic.Latin}", u"ab c") > [] > In the re module a malformed pattern is sometimes treated as a literal: >>> re.match(r"a{1,2", r"a{1,2").group() 'a{1,2' which is what I'm trying to replicate, as far as possible. Which characters should it accept when parsing the property name, even if it subsequently rejects the name? I don't want it to accept every character until it sees the closing '}'. I currently include alphanumeric, whitespace, '&', '_' and '-'. '.' might be a reasonable addition. > > I was also surprised by the added pos/endpos parameters, as I used flags as a non-keyword third parameter for the re functions in my code (probably my fault ...) > > re.findall(pattern, string, flags=0) > > regex.findall(pattern, string, pos=None, endpos=None, flags=0, overlapped=False) > > (is there a specific reason for this order, or could it be changed to maintain compatibility with the current re module?) > Oops! I'll fix that. > I hope, at least some of these remarks make some sense; > thanks for the continued work on this module! > All constructive remarks are welcome! :-)

1 0

Re: [Python-Dev] Add UTC to 2.7 (PyCon sprint idea)
by Brett Cannon Feb. 17, 2010

Feb. 17, 2010

Defaulting to UTC is not a good idea, which is why relevant methods take an argument to specify whether to be UTC (exact details are in the patch; don't remember exact details). On Feb 16, 2010 4:07 PM, "Greg Ewing" <greg.ewing(a)canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: Brett Cannon wrote: > Issue 5094 already has a patch that is nearly complete to provide a > default... Are you sure it's really a good idea to default to UTC? I thought it was considered a feature that datetime objects are naive unless you explicitly specify a timezone. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev(a)python.org http:...

1 0