Mailman 3 August 2010 - Python-Dev

IBM P-690 server looking for a home
by Randall Walls 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Greetings, The company I work for has an IBM P-690 server that is in the process of being retired. It is still a viable server, and has seen almost 0 use (it was our failover machine). Unfortunately for us, this machine has little to no resale value, and will probably be junked. I'd rather it go to a good home, and having taken advantage of the work of the python development community for a number of years (we use python extensively in system admin and database work), I saw this as an opportunity to give back a little. So, If anyone is interested in this machine, please let me know. We are looking at perhaps a November time frame for when it will be removed from our remote site. The P690 is no small machine, it is the size of a full rack and has 32 Power4 processors in it and takes (I believe) 2 or 3 phase 220 Volt power. It weighs nearly a ton. We are running AIX5.3 on it, but I believe that the machine is capable of running a PowerPC flavor of Linux as well. This would make a great test machine for python HPC modules or as a community box where developers could test their code against a PowerPC architecture. It has lots of life left and I'd rather see it put to use then thrown away. Thanks, -- Randall

2 1

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r84190 - python/branches/release31-maint/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst
by Tarek Ziadé 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Éric Araujo <merwok(a)netwok.org> wrote: > Let’s turn one error into an occasion for learning: > >> Log: >> Manually merge r84187 > > I was bad with numbers and actually ran svnmerge merge -r 81417, which > did nothing. Since I have manually merged now, do I have to update the > bookkeeping information manually? My understanding of the dev FAQ is: > svnmerge block -r 84187. Is that right? What I do is : 4 cd /the/right/branch/or/trunk $ svn ci -m 'comment' you get a revision number $ cd py3k $ svn up $ svnmerge.py merge -r revision $ run the tests $ svn ci -F svn<tab> (there's a svn*.txt file generated by the svnmerge tool, don't do a manual comment) Then I apply the same in all branches. Notice that if you merge something to py3k, the merge to the 3.x release branch is done with the revision number of the py3k commit, not the original one. And I use "svnmerge block -r revision" for branches where the commit should not be applied, don't forget to do this. (same revision number cascading applies) Let me know if you have any other issue Cheers arek > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-checkins mailing list > Python-checkins(a)python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org

9 13

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r84209 - python/branches/py3k/Python/ast.c
by Victor Stinner 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Le jeudi 19 août 2010 19:43:15, amaury.forgeotdarc a écrit : > Author: amaury.forgeotdarc > Date: Thu Aug 19 19:43:15 2010 > New Revision: 84209 > > Log: > Check the return values for all functions returning an ast node. > Failure to do it may result in strange error messages or even crashes, > in admittedly convoluted cases that are normally syntax errors, like: > def f(*xx, __debug__): pass Would it be possible to write tests for this change? -- Victor Stinner http://www.haypocalc.com/

1 0

Possible bug in randint when importing pylab?
by Timothy Kinney 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

I am getting some unexpected behavior in Python 2.6.4 on a WinXP SP3 box. If I run the following: [code] from pylab import randint for s in range(100): print randint(0,1) [/code] I get 100 zeroes. If I import randint from random instead, I get the expected behavior of a random distribution of 1s and 0s. I found this by importing * from pylab after importing randint from random. What is going on? Is pylab's randint function broken somehow? Could this be due to installing scipy into a 2.6 environment when it was designed for the 2.5 environment? cinead

4 3

Re: [Python-Dev] r84204 - in python/branches/py3k/Lib: os.py test/test_os.py
by Antoine Pitrou 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:10:19 +0200 (CEST) victor.stinner <python-checkins(a)python.org> wrote: > Author: victor.stinner > Date: Thu Aug 19 19:10:18 2010 > New Revision: 84204 > > Log: > Fix os.get_exec_path() (code and tests) for python -bb > > Catch BytesWarning exceptions. You should not catch warnings, but silence them using constructs provided by the warnings module: with warnings.catch_warnings(): warnings.simplefilter(ignore, BytesWarning) # the rest of your code Otherwise you'll get buggy behaviour where e.g. env[b'PATH'] raises BytesWarning because of an unicode key, but it would have succeeded otherwise. Regards Antoine.

1 0

Oddity in AST for 3-argument slices
by Greg Ewing 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

I've discovered a slightly surprising thing about the way AST objects for slices are constructed. According to Python.asdl, all three parts of a slice are optional: slice = Slice(expr? lower, expr? upper, expr? step) But that's not quite the way the parser sees things: Python 3.1.2 (r312:79147, Aug 19 2010, 20:26:20) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import ast >>> t = ast.parse("x[::]", mode='eval') >>> ast.dump(t) "Expression(body=Subscript(value=Name(id='x', ctx=Load()), slice=Slice(lower=None, upper=None, step=Name(id='None', ctx=Load())), ctx=Load()))" In other words, x[::] is being parsed as though it had been written x[::None] Is there a good reason for an omitted third slice argument being treated differently from the others? -- Greg

2 3

Fwd: Old link text in documentation
by Michael Foord 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python 2.7 as stable? All the best, Michael -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Old link text in documentation Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:49:34 -0700 From: Aaron DeVore <aaron.devore(a)gmail.com> To: webmaster(a)python.org The link text at http://docs.python.org/py3k/ under "Docs for other versions" still describes 2.7 as being "in development" -Aaron DeVore

3 3

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r84166 - python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt
by Benjamin Peterson 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

2010/8/17 martin.v.loewis <python-checkins(a)python.org>: > Author: martin.v.loewis > Date: Wed Aug 18 00:58:42 2010 > New Revision: 84166 > > Log: > Add Ask Solem. > > > Modified: > python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt > > Modified: python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt > ============================================================================== > --- python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt (original) > +++ python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt Wed Aug 18 00:58:42 2010 > @@ -20,6 +20,10 @@ > Permissions History > ------------------- > > +- Ask Solem was given commit access on Aug 17 2010 by MvL, > + on recommendation by Jesse Noller, for work on the subprocess > + library. IIRC it was multiprocessing. -- Regards, Benjamin

2 1

multi-version parallel-installed modules
by Neal Becker 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

Is there any proposal to accommodate having parallel-installed multiple versions of modules? I have client code in multiple projects using version x.y of a C-compiled module A. I want to test a new version x.z of module A, but all client software needs to be recompiled against the new version. If I just install the module, all the other client software breaks. I know I could test using virtualenv, but there would be a lot of modules to install into virtualenv to run the tests, so this would be cumbersome. I'd prefer to have multiple version co-exist so I could update projects to the new version at my convenience. How does this situation happen? I have lots of c++ code using pyublas, which allows c++ code written to the boost::ublas interface to operate on numpy vectors/matrixes. pyublas is built against boost libs. pyublas installs a module, whose purpose is to register conversions. When I update boost libs, I have to rebuild pyublas and install the updated module. Then rebuild my client software modules. If pyublas is built against a different boost version than my client modules, the conversions will fail.

3 2

PEP 3149 - updated patch
by Barry Warsaw 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

I've re-merged the py3k trunk to my PEP 3149 branch and uploaded a new diff. For reference, here's the PEP: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3149/ and the tracker issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue9193 along with the updated patch: http://bugs.python.org/file18558/pep3149.txt and the Launchpad branch: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~barry/python/sovers I'd like to know if anybody has additional feedback, suggestions, or objections that you think still need to be addressed. You can follow up here or in the tracker. Now that 2.6.6 is almost off my plate, I'd like to bring this PEP to its (hopefully successful) conclusion. Cheers, -Barry

1 0