Mailman 3 July 2012 - Python-Dev

2.7 releases
by Thomas Heller July 27, 2012

July 27, 2012

Will there be more 2.7 bugfix releases, and when the next one? In other words; if I submit a patch and it is accepted, can I expect that patch be committed also to the 2.7 branch? Thanks, Thomas Been a long time that I've been here - but still using Python (2.7 now) more and more...

7 7

Summary of Python tracker Issues
by Python tracker July 27, 2012

July 27, 2012

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-07-20 - 2012-07-27) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open 3532 ( +4) closed 23716 (+58) total 27248 (+62) Open issues with patches: 1514 Issues opened (48) ================== #14330: don't use host python, use host search paths for host compiler http://bugs.python.org/issue14330 reopened by ezio.melotti #15231: … [View More]

1 0

Who's maintaining Sphinx nowadays?
by Chris Withers July 26, 2012

July 26, 2012

Hi All, Sorry if this is considered slightly off topic, but Sphinx is the tool we use for the Python core docs so: Who's looking after Sphinx nowadays? I've hit what I consider to be a bug: https://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev/browse_thread/thread/197fc26ba57… So I forked on bitbucket and wanted to work up a fix, but running the unit tests on my fresh fork was problematic: https://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev/browse_thread/thread/1e1f45978a8… The sphinx-dev group seems … [View More]

2 2

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.2): Issue #15445: Updated logging configuration documentation to highlight
by Nick Coghlan July 26, 2012

July 26, 2012

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:20 AM, vinay.sajip <python-checkins(a)python.org> wrote: > + .. note:: Because portions of the configuration are passed through > + :func:`eval`, use of this function may open its users to a security risk. > + While the function only binds to a socket on ``localhost``, and so does > + not accept connections from remote machines, there are scenarios where > + untrusted code could be run under the account of the process which … [View More]

1 0

Building python 2.7.3 with Visual Studio 2012 (VS11.0)
by Wim Colgate July 24, 2012

July 24, 2012

Please forgive me if this is not the prescribed method for asking this question. For various reasons, I would like to build python 2.7.3 from source using the latest VS tools (VS11.0 is in RC -- which is close enough for my purposes). I have seen the various sub-directories (VC6, VS7.1 and VS8.0) in the sources for specific VS tool chains. I have also seen the patch for VS 10.0 (http://wiki.python.org/moin/VS2010). If building with VS11.0, is there more than just applying the equivalent VS10.… [View More]

3 2

2to3 porting HOWTO: setup.py question
by Oscar Benjamin July 24, 2012

July 24, 2012

On 22 July 2012 14:08, R. David Murray <rdmurray(a)bitdance.com> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:21:38 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techtonik(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > http://docs.python.org/py3k/howto/pyporting.html#during-installation > > > > What's the point in making implicit Python 3 check here: > > try: # Python 3 > > from distutils.command.build_py import build_py_2to3 as build_py > > except ImportError: # Python 2 > > from … [View More]

8 11

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.2 -> default): MERGE: Better test for Issue #15402: Add a __sizeof__ method to struct.Struct
by Meador Inge July 24, 2012

July 24, 2012

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, jesus.cea <python-checkins(a)python.org> wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b9a3ed1b14b9 > changeset: 78260:b9a3ed1b14b9 > parent: 78257:03063e718f5f > parent: 78259:1911e192af0d > user: Jesus Cea <jcea(a)jcea.es> > date: Mon Jul 23 18:16:18 2012 +0200 > summary: > MERGE: Better test for Issue #15402: Add a __sizeof__ method to struct.Struct > > files: > Doc/ACKS.txt | … [View More] 1 + > Lib/test/test_struct.py | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Jesús, Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation contributions. Serhiy is already in Misc/ACKS. No need to add him to Doc/ACKS.txt. As for the tests, I intentionally kept them the way that Serhiy contributed them -- using >= instead of >. I kept them this way because we also discussed in issue14596 the prospect of optimizing the way repeat counts are handled. These tests would start failing if (when) that optimization happens. So, neither of these changes are really necessary. Although, it wouldn't hurt to have *additional* tests using the > relation. > > diff --git a/Doc/ACKS.txt b/Doc/ACKS.txt > --- a/Doc/ACKS.txt > +++ b/Doc/ACKS.txt > @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ > * Anthony Starks > * Greg Stein > * Peter Stoehr > + * Serhiy Storchaka > * Mark Summerfield > * Reuben Sumner > * Kalle Svensson > diff --git a/Lib/test/test_struct.py b/Lib/test/test_struct.py > --- a/Lib/test/test_struct.py > +++ b/Lib/test/test_struct.py > @@ -575,12 +575,12 @@ > def test_sizeof(self): > self.assertGreater(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('BHILfdspP')), > sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('B'))) > - self.assertGreaterEqual(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('123B')), > + self.assertGreater(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('123B')), > sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('B'))) > - self.assertGreaterEqual(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('B' * 123)), > + self.assertGreater(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('B' * 1234)), > sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('123B'))) > - self.assertGreaterEqual(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('123xB')), > - sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('B'))) > + self.assertGreater(sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('1234B')), > + sys.getsizeof(struct.Struct('123B'))) > > def test_main(): > run_unittest(StructTest) > > -- > Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/cpython > > _______________________________________________ > Python-checkins mailing list > Python-checkins(a)python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins > -- # Meador [View Less]

9 15

Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS
by Chris Jerdonek July 23, 2012

July 23, 2012

> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:17:32 +0200 > From: Antoine Pitrou <solipsis(a)pitrou.net> > To: python-dev(a)python.org > Subject: [Python-Dev] Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS > >> > Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation >> > contributions. Serhiy is already in Misc/ACKS. No need to add him >> > to Doc/ACKS.txt. >> > That said, we could probably merge Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS (*). There > doesn't seem to be any strong argument for … [View More]

1 0

venv scripts for fish and csh shells
by Andrew Svetlov July 23, 2012

July 23, 2012

virtualenv has virtualenv.csh and virtualenv.fish files. Is there any reason for restricting venv to bash/zsh only? -- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov

5 9

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.2 -> default): Merge #15232: correctly mangle From lines in MIME preamble and epilogue
by Meador Inge July 23, 2012

July 23, 2012

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:55 PM, r.david.murray <python-checkins(a)python.org> wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/80b81658455b > changeset: 78246:80b81658455b > parent: 78244:c43d73277756 > parent: 78245:b97f65f2298d > user: R David Murray <rdmurray(a)bitdance.com> > date: Sun Jul 22 21:53:54 2012 -0400 > summary: > Merge #15232: correctly mangle From lines in MIME preamble and epilogue > > files: > Lib/email/… [View More]generator.py | 12 ++++++++- > Lib/test/test_email/test_email.py | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ > Misc/NEWS | 3 ++ > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) I'm not quite sure what happened, but something seems to have gone wrong with this merge. After doing the following while on the "default" branch: $ hg merge 3.2 I see: $ hg st M Lib/email/generator.py M Lib/test/test_email/test_email.py M Misc/NEWS and a bunch of conflicts in 'Misc/NEWS'. > > diff --git a/Lib/email/generator.py b/Lib/email/generator.py > --- a/Lib/email/generator.py > +++ b/Lib/email/generator.py > @@ -252,7 +252,11 @@ > msg.set_boundary(boundary) > # If there's a preamble, write it out, with a trailing CRLF > if msg.preamble is not None: > - self.write(msg.preamble + self._NL) > + if self._mangle_from_: > + preamble = fcre.sub('>From ', msg.preamble) > + else: > + preamble = msg.preamble > + self.write(preamble + self._NL) > # dash-boundary transport-padding CRLF > self.write('--' + boundary + self._NL) > # body-part > @@ -270,7 +274,11 @@ > self.write(self._NL + '--' + boundary + '--') > if msg.epilogue is not None: > self.write(self._NL) > - self.write(msg.epilogue) > + if self._mangle_from_: > + epilogue = fcre.sub('>From ', msg.epilogue) > + else: > + epilogue = msg.epilogue > + self.write(epilogue) > > def _handle_multipart_signed(self, msg): > # The contents of signed parts has to stay unmodified in order to keep > diff --git a/Lib/test/test_email/test_email.py b/Lib/test/test_email/test_email.py > --- a/Lib/test/test_email/test_email.py > +++ b/Lib/test/test_email/test_email.py > @@ -1283,6 +1283,28 @@ > Blah blah blah > """) > > + def test_mangle_from_in_preamble_and_epilog(self): > + s = StringIO() > + g = Generator(s, mangle_from_=True) > + msg = email.message_from_string(textwrap.dedent("""\ > + From: foo(a)bar.com > + Mime-Version: 1.0 > + Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=XXX > + > + From somewhere unknown > + > + --XXX > + Content-Type: text/plain > + > + foo > + > + --XXX-- > + > + From somewhere unknowable > + """)) > + g.flatten(msg) > + self.assertEqual(len([1 for x in s.getvalue().split('\n') > + if x.startswith('>From ')]), 2) > > > # Test the basic MIMEAudio class > diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS > --- a/Misc/NEWS > +++ b/Misc/NEWS > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ > Library > ------- > > +- Issue #15232: when mangle_from is True, email.Generator now correctly mangles > + lines that start with 'From' that occur in a MIME preamble or epilogue. > + > - Issue #15094: Incorrectly placed #endif in _tkinter.c. > Patch by Serhiy Storchaka. > > > -- > Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/cpython > > _______________________________________________ > Python-checkins mailing list > Python-checkins(a)python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins > -- # Meador [View Less]

1 1