March 30, 2006
4:09 p.m.
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Such a module name is less likely to cause problems.
Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', instead.
except that "sqlite" was the name used by the first pysqlite generation:
$ python2.3
import sqlite sqlite.version
'1.1.6'
I'm not sure how much trouble reusing this name would cause, but I'm quite sure the amount of trouble is larger than "none at all".
"sqlitedb" is not taken yet. -- Gerhard