On 14 Sep, 2013, at 8:30, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:

> However, I agree the current wording only conveys that to the handful
> of people that already know exactly when in the attribute lookup
> sequence that step occurs, which is a rather niche audience :)

I've been fooling around with this long enough that I forgot that not
everyone knows this :-).

I guess I'd better include a clearer and more complete description
of the current attribute resolution protocol and how my proposal affects
that.  A nice readable Python implementation of that protocol would be nice
to have regardless of the fate of this PEP.