David Beazley wrote:
Depending on how deep I want to dig, I may have some patches to ParseTuple() that would make life easier for some of us extension writing fans. As it is right now, my experimental version of Swig is using it's own version of ParseTuple (for various reasons). Also, out of curiousity, is anyone making heavy use of the CObject type right now?
You mean the one in Objects/cobject.c ? Sure, all my type extensions export their C API that way... and it works just great (no more linker problems, nice error messages when extensions are not found, etc.).