A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" email@example.com wrote:
If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a suitable patch for contribution.
I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.
I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado.
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org