A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:

On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <benno@benno.id.au> wrote:
> If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a
> suitable patch for contribution.

I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.

I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado.


Python-Dev mailing list
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org

--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)