8 Sep
2008
8 Sep
'08
12:05 p.m.
So, er, is this a remotely sane thing to be doing, and does anyone have suggestions? :)
Not for 2.6/3.0 - but after that: sounds good. OTOH, I don't see a clear technical *need* for these data to be const. In general, const-ness helps correctness and sharing across processes, and the cases you provide are correct and provide sharing even without being const. Regards, Martin