
24 Oct
2009
24 Oct
'09
2:13 p.m.
Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky <at> gmail.com> writes:
AB> I disagree with Martin. I think interning is a set AB> operation and it is unfortunate that set API does not AB> support it directly.
ML> I disagree with Alexander's last remark in several respects:
[...]
ML> The operation "give me the member equal but not identical ML> to E" is conceptually a lookup operation; the mathematical set ML> construct has no such operation, and the Python set models ML> it closely. IOW, set is *not* a dict with key==value.
This looks like a debate of purity vs. practicality.
I don't have any opinion on a Python-facing API, but the interpreter's dict of interned strings could probably converted to a set as a simple optimization.
Regards
Antoine.