On 27 February 2011 01:40, Nick Coghlan email@example.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Georg Brandl firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed, and/or not the same as "default".
Problem is, you then have 1.5.2 released from the 2.x branch :)
In that case, "legacy-trunk" would seem clearer.
Exactly what I was about to suggest.