On 27 February 2011 01:40, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I
>> could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed,
>> and/or not the same as "default".
>
> Problem is, you then have 1.5.2 released from the 2.x branch :)

In that case, "legacy-trunk" would seem clearer.

+1

Exactly what I was about to suggest.

Tim Delaney