At 06:18 PM 8/27/03 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Last question (I hope): as a feature, I presume this has to wait for
get in, yes?
Hmm, it won't break backward compatibility, so maybe 2.3.1 would be okay. OTOH, it ain't a bug fix. OTOOH, 2.4 is a loonnngg way away.
As a practical matter, I'll initially be writing this as a patch against 2.2, which is where I actually need it. :) But I'll port it to be against 2.3 before I submit it.
Hmmm... that makes me think of tests... I guess I won't really be able to supply a test for the feature, since that would just be testing whether the feature is available.