I don't remember this topic ever being discussed, but still I wouldn't expect that __something to be mangled, given that it refers to an attribute of an instance of D. I might expect that in a "case D(something=__y)" you get the mangling for __y, but I'm not sure what the implementation does now and I'm writing from my phone On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, 20:12 , <dw-git@d-woods.co.uk> wrote:
For this code:
class C: def f(self, x): match x: case D(__something=y): return y
It appears that the name "__something" isn't mangled. Under most other circumstances I'd expect this to be mangled to "_C__something". Is this: * intentional, * accidental, but how that it's done it's the defined behaviour, * or a defect?
It doesn't seem like it's explicitly tested for in test_patma.py either way.
Thanks David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/LILLO3MB... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/