On Monday, February 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:07:50 +0300 anatoly techtonik <firstname.lastname@example.org (mailto:email@example.com)> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Guido van Rossum <firstname.lastname@example.org (mailto:email@example.com)> wrote:
Anatoly, stop this discussion *NOW*. It is not appropriate for python-dev and you risk being banned from python-dev if you keep it up.
It is not a problem for me to keep silence for another couple of months. But this weekend there will be an open source conference in Belarus , and I will need to explain what this specific CLA is about in developer-friendly language translated to Russian.
The Python contributor agreement allows the PSF to safely redistribute your contributions under its own license, the PSF license.
The Python contributor agreement is *not* a copyright assignment: you legally remain the author of the code you contributed (i.e. you can also publish it elsewhere under any license you want).
FWIW: Django's FAQ spells out the same reasons we have one for Python:
just s/Django/Python/ and s/Django Software Foundation/Python Software Foundation/ - it's a good concise FAQ.