On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 7:00 PM Joao S. O. Bueno firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
"check_all_bits_defined" or something along it.
Best suggestion so far. Similar:
I am all for brainstorming, as we've been doing for a few days. Maybe we need to brainstorm some more.
I just don't think the goal should be finding a one/two-word name for the decorator.
I see no need to find something shorter than a short sentence. After all, defining a new enum is not something we do all the time.
On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 18:30, Ethan Furman email@example.com wrote:
On 5/28/21 12:43 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 28. 05. 21 5:24, Ethan Furman wrote:
class FlagWithMasks(IntFlag): DEFAULT = 0x0 FIRST_MASK = 0xF FIRST_ROUND = 0x0 FIRST_CEIL = 0x1 FIRST_TRUNC = 0x2 SECOND_MASK = 0xF0 SECOND_RECALC = 0x00 SECOND_NO_RECALC = 0x10 THIRD_MASK = 0xF00 THIRD_DISCARD = 0x000 THIRD_KEEP = 0x100
Here we have three flags (FIRST_MASK, SECOND_MASK, THIRD_MASK) that are aliasing values that don't exist, but it seems intentional and not an error.
Are you looking for a decorator for the whole Enum, or a way to mark individual *values* as masks?
The decorator is for whole enum. The issue is not that some values are masks, but whether the absence of named bits covered by the mask is an error.
-- ~Ethan~ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to email@example.com https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://firstname.lastname@example.org/message/OM5M774M... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Python-Dev mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://email@example.com/message/WX7YCSRR... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/