On Mon., 18 Nov. 2019, 6:52 am MRAB, <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
On 2019-11-17 20:09, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> To add some more input about forward references, here are couple of
> thoughts:
> 1. I think ideally we should support forward references to the same
> extent they are currently supported:
> i.e. Union[None, "ForwardRef"], Union["OtherForwardRef", None], and
> Union["ForwardRef", "OtherForwardRef"]
> should all be supported. The last one looks the hardest, in the sense
> that it looks like we will need
> to add `str.__or__()` to support these forms.
I'm not sure I like the thought of adding `str.__or__()` because it
would mean that "Foo" | "Bar" becomes valid and returns a type, which is

Perhaps an alternative would be to add 'Forward' to make it explicit:

     Forward("ForwardRef") | Forward("OtherForwardRef")

or just:

     Forward("ForwardRef") | "OtherForwardRef"

Or require that the entire expression be quoted in that case: "ForwardRef | OtherForwardRef"

I wouldn't personally object to an explicit "typing.Forward" construct, though.