On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 16:08, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek@gmail.com> wrote:

I think we've reached a consensus on those two PEPs.

Although, there's one last point that was forgotten in the discussions
: I've introduced "rc" in the pre-releases markers, so PEP 386 is
compatible with Python's own version scheme.  "rc" comes right after
"c" in the sorting. It's slightly redundant with the "c" marker but I
don't think this really matters as long as consumers know how to order
them (a < b < c < rc). I have also stated that "c" is the preferred
marker for third party projects, from PEP 386 point of view.

Is there anything else I can do to make those two PEPs accepted ?

As you said, consensus has been reached, so just Guido's BDFL stamp of approval is all I can think of.