I never want to iterate, but I love slice syntax and indexing. Don't think you can have that w/o being able to loop over it can you? Maybe I'm just thinking slow since I just woke up. On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2013 04:55 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
This I sort of agree with. I've often enough wanted to know if something is a non-string iterable. But you'd have to decide if bytes/bytearray is a sequence of integers or a scaler...
In fifteen years of Python programming, I have literally *never* wanted to iterate over 'str' (or now 'bytes'). I've always considered the fact that Python made them iterable by default (rather than e.g. defining a method / property to get to an iterable "view" on the underlying string) a wart and a serious bug magnet.
Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlG8Y7MACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6EbwCfYlC3JKL22HK7WgxJLAh9Gk2H R4cAn2+ijAkebHuF92txeddBq99L/zqn =bLkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/donald%40stufft.io