On 22.11.13 00:53, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:43:37 -0500 Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 06:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
As usual, 'I am not a lawyer', but if Christian wants to push forward with using 'Python 2.8', I suggest that he consult the PSF Trademark Committee and lawyer first. Just to make clear, I'm definitely *not* suggesting this particular case ever escalate to such a level. Chris is our friend and a nice guy. :)
I'm just saying that I think we should avoid any possible confusion on the part of ours (and Stackless's) users. And based on the discussions here, there are plenty of good alternatives. +1 from me :-)
Thank you for that input! It was important and urgent, as I saw myself jumping into the wrong wagon, again. -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@stackless.com> Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/