28 Mar
2006
28 Mar
'06
3:37 p.m.
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:00 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:53, Neal Norwitz wrote:
In order to do the best possible job and avoid silly errors, there shouldn't be any checkins which could change behaviour that do not include a test. I'm not talking about updating comments or string constants. But even trivial changes can cause regressions or incompatible changes. Just like failing tests, code checked in without tests is fair game for being reverted if there is anything questionable.
+1 from me.
Anyone disagree?
Not me! -Barry