Nov. 28, 2000
10:17 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 02:13:47PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
229 is not sufficiently worked out and doesn't seem a priority. (This can still make it into 2.1 if the author does the work.)
I was waiting for further comments on the idea before actually doing the work. Anyone see gaping holes in the basic idea? (I *can* just charge ahead and work on it anyway...) --amk