2012/12/27 Sven Brauch
2012/12/27 Guido van Rossum
: So just submit a patch to the tracker...
--Guido
On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Sven Brauch wrote:
2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan
: It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be possible to backport it to any earlier releases.
Yes, that is understandable. It wouldn't be much of a problem tough, my whole project is pretty bleeding-edge anyways, and depending on python >= 3.4 wouldn't hurt. For me it would only be important to have an acceptable solution for this long-term.
Greetings, Sven _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
I submitted a patch to the tracker, see http://bugs.python.org/issue16795. The patch only contains the very minimum set of changes which are necessary. There's still a few things you'll need to work around when writing a static language analyzer, but none of them is too much work, so I didn't include them for now in order to keep things compact.
Thanks and best regards, Sven
Ping! Nobody complained since I proposed the patch a week ago, just some people added themselves to the notify list. What do you think? Cheers, Sven