Hi, Could we please stick to the point of renaming a Git branch? Today, renaming a branch is easy. The rationale has been given. I don't think any argument is going to make the Steering Concil changing their mind ("the consensus was that we should do that"). If you want to help, please remain at the technical level to help making this migration as smooth as possible for everybody. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:09 PM Evpok Padding <evpok.padding@gmail.com> wrote:
If the discussion here can stay civil for changes with far more repercussions for Python (e.g. controversial PEPs), surely it can stay civil for this too.
Thanks. For people able to remain constructive and civil, please join the discussion on the devguide on "listing terms which should be avoided": https://github.com/python/devguide/issues/605 While it's not easy to give an exhaustive list of terms which should be avoided, IMO it would prevent future discussion like this thread. I'm tired of such discussion which is not constructive at all and goes nowhere. People love to take it as an opportonity to troll and quickly messages become more and more offensive. IMO https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/styleguide/inclusive... is a good example to follow: it's short and gives concrete advices for better terms. Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death.