-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 30, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
1. Barry, who is the release manager for 3.0.1, does not like the idea of the cruft that is being proposed removed from 3.0.1.
I don't think he actually said that (in fact, I think he said the opposite). It would be good if he clarified, though.
To clarify: cruft that should have been removed 3.0 is fine to remove for 3.0.1, for some definition of "should have been". Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSYMkxXEjvBPtnXfVAQIqtgP+Mra/z5nLY5SU56cw0JjgBwCVY1N3060K TSG90E4R+JpCsXRD7sjf2UfSAzKAGKz6gYja3hnt5awzhnCJMacgN0tvXNaAmuYi b7Qb6N4oV3izDGZPl3x0EO3DGimov2Nq8hCsEZbYnNd3U62MwRlzpW+FJbFJlZHO VR1jiVWX8Ig= =p0VE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----