So code that depends on iterating through bytecode via HAS_ARG is going to break...

Darn it. :/

[ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong.

On Apr 13, 2016 4:44 PM, "Victor Stinner" <> wrote:
Le mercredi 13 avril 2016, Ryan Gonzalez <> a écrit :

What is the value of HAS_ARG going to be now?

I asked Demur to keep HAS_ARG(). Not really for backward compatibility, but for the dis module: to keep a nice assembler. There are also debug traces in ceval.c which use it.

For ceval.c, we might use HAS_ARG() to micro-optimize oparg=0 (hardcode 0 rather than reading the bytecode) for operators with no argument. Or maybe it's completly useless :-)