Aug. 6, 1999
2:10 a.m.
"AMK" == Andrew M Kuchling <akuchlin@mems-exchange.org> writes:
AMK> I suppose this leads to a more important question: at what AMK> point should we start checking 1.6-only things into the CVS AMK> tree? For example, once the current alphas of the re module AMK> are up to it (they're not yet), when should they be checked AMK> in? Good question. I've had a bunch of people ask about the string methods branch, which I'm assuming will be a 1.6 feature, and I'd like to get that checked in at some point too. I think what's holding this up is that Guido hasn't decided whether there will be a patch release to 1.5.2 or not. -Barry