11 Jan
2013
11 Jan
'13
4:08 p.m.
Am 11.01.2013 07:09, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM,
wrote: results for aef7db0d3893 on branch "default" --------------------------------------------
test_dbm leaked [2, 0, 0] references, sum=2 test_dbm leaked [2, 2, 1] memory blocks, sum=5
Hmm, I'm starting to wonder if there's something to this one - it seems to be popping up a bit lately.
test_xml_etree_c leaked [56, 56, 56] references, sum=168 test_xml_etree_c leaked [36, 38, 38] memory blocks, sum=112
I'm gonna take a wild guess and suggest there may be a problem with the recent pickling fix in the C extension :)
It has more issues. Coverity has sent me some complains, see attachment.