Sept. 16, 2015
9:50 a.m.
On 16 Sep 2015 18:48, "Paul Moore" <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 September 2015 at 06:10, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>
wrote:
The only thing that hg really lost badly on IMO was "named branches", and that's been fixed with bookmarks.
FWIW, I still find bookmarks confusing to use compared to git branches. I don't know whether that's because bitbucket doesn't support them well,
It's BitBucket - their PR system for Mercurial primarily relies on named branches rather than bookmarks. Gory details: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/6705/cant-create-pull-request-from-... Regards, Nick.