Jan. 12, 2003
4:52 a.m.
etc). But I
believe we could simply lean on them for their implementations at runtime.
Ah, so that void (*funcTLSAlloc)(...) was supposed to be something supplied by the extension writer?
Hmm, the Boost interface doesn't work that way, and AFAICT wouldn't be easily adapted to it.
Windows and Mozilla work as you describe too, but I don't see the problem. For both of these, we would just provide a 3 <wink> line stub function, which uses the platform TLS API to return a "void *" we previously stashed. This local function is passed in. But yeah, as I said before, happy to YAGNI it. Mark.