March 10, 2009
3:35 p.m.
Dan Mahn <dan.mahn@digidescorp.com> wrote:
Yes, that was a good idea. I found some problems, and attached a new version. It looks more complicated than I wanted, but it is a very regular repetition, so I hope it is generally readable.
That's great, but I was hoping for more tests in lib/test/test_urllib.py. Bill