27 Jun
2001
27 Jun
'01
2:06 a.m.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Here's another sweet and short PEP. What do folks think? Is xrange()'s complexity really worth having?
Are there still known bugs that will take some effort to repair? Is xrange constantly touched when changes are made elsewhere? If no to both, then I suggest don't fix what ain't broken; life is too short. (Unless it is annoying you to distraction, then do the deed and get it over with.)