Feb. 26, 2011
4:44 p.m.
Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 08:38 -0800, Daniel Stutzbach a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote: Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed, and/or not the same as "default".
Can we just get rid of "trunk" altogether? It's history is a strict subset of the 2.7 branch's history, isn't it?
Named branches are exclusive, they can't be a subset of each other ;) (in other words: 2.7 starts where trunk stops; trunk changesets are strict ancestors of 2.7) Regards Antoine.