15 Apr
2010
15 Apr
'10
11:58 a.m.
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I see the confusion. I think Martin meant more about open issues that required discussion, not simply issues that had a patch ready to go.
Ach. I hit 'send' too soon. I also wanted to say: it seemed quite clear to me that Martin specifically meant "simply issues that had a patch ready to go". Quoting him exactly:
Please understand that setting the state of an issue to "review" may *not* be the best way to trigger a review - it may be more effective to post to python-dev if you truly believe that the patch can be committed as-is. It seems that perhaps the core developers have slightly different opinions about this? :)